College of Education Graduate Follow-Up Survey

Assessment: Graduate Follow-up Phone Survey

Administration: This survey is administered annually. The first two surveys were done in the Fall of 95 and again in the Fall of
96. To increase the response rate, the third Graduate Follow-up Survey was conducted in the Summer of 98 because it was
determined that the students would be easier to reach by phone when school was not in session.

Respondents: Students who graduated from COE undergraduate teacher preparation programs were contacted.

Purpose: Students were asked about their current employment status. If the student reported they were currently teaching,
they were then asked if their degree programs prepared them for their teaching position by responding to eight questions based
on the COE undergraduate programs Conceptual Framework.

Summary of Results: For the 95 and 96 surveys, on a three point scale all areas were rated above 2.5 except "teaching
diverse learners" and "classroom management".

Interpretation of Results: Additional assessment information needs to be collected in the two areas rated low. Department
heads and faculty members will take into consideration the survey results when planning new programs and courses for
semester conversion.



During fall 1996, a telephone survey was conducted through the Dean’s Office of the College of Education. All students who
completed their student teaching experience during the fall, winter, or spring quarters, 1995-1996 were included in the survey.
Of the 418 student teachers, 89 were contacted or 21%. They were asked if they were currently teaching. If they were,
additional information collected included the school where they are teaching, along with grade/subject, and a rating of strong,
adequate, or weak on eight of the conceptual framework principles. If they were not teaching, they were asked if they were
currently enrolled in college for additional course work, the program of study, and the college/university. All those contacted
were also asked to provide any comments they may have about their program.

Of the 89 surveyed, 69 are now teaching , or 78%. Of the conceptual framework principles that current teachers perceived as
their strongest, working with others and knowledge of subject matter were rated highest. The respondents perceived the
principles related to teaching diverse learners and classroom management to be the weakest at this point in their first year of
teaching. All rankings by program for all principles, as well as percentages of those contacted that are now teaching are
provided in Table 1. Rankings could range to 3.00, strong, to 1.00, weak. College of Education totals are included in the table.

Program

N

Percent Teaching

Knowledge of Subject Matter

Teaching Diverse Learners

Variety of Instructional Strategies

Classroom Management

Planning Instruction

Assessing Student Progress

Self Evaluation

Working With Others

Business

7

43%

2.86

2.57

2.57

2.71

2.86

2.86

2.86

2.86

Early Childhood

32

75%

2.88

2.56

2.69

2.44

2.84

2.63

2.74

2.84

Health & Physical Ed.

1

0%

3.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

3.00

3.00

3.00

3.00

Middle Grades

10

90%

2.60

2.10

2.80

2.30

2.90

2.80

3.00

3.00

Music

2

100%

2.50

2.50

2.50

2.50

2.50

3.00

2.50

3.00

English (7-12)

5

80%

3.00

2.60

2.80

2.20

2.60

2.80

2.40

3.00

Science (7-12)

5

100%

3.00

2.60

2.60

2.40

2.60

2.80

2.60

2.80

Special Education

24

88%

2.79

2.63

2.75

2.62

2.67

2.88

2.75

2.83

Art Education

1

0%

3.00

2.00

3.00

1.00

3.00

2.00

3.00

2.00

Math

2

100%

3.00

2.00

3.00

1.50

1.50

2.50

2.50

3.00

Totals (1996)

89

78%

2.83

2.51

2.69

2.43

2.74

2.75

2.75

2.87

Totals (1995)

129

77%

2.65

2.22

2.86

2.41

2.72

2.57

2.58

2.87


cecback.gif

Submitted by: Chief Compiler: Date:
Valdosta State University
1500 N. Patterson St.
Valdosta, GA  31698-0102
Susan R. Worth
sworth@valdosta.edu
Phone: 912-333-5932
Fax: 912-333-7167
February 1, 1999

Section I Checklist | Form A: Faculty | Section II Checklist | Section III Checklist

Appendix:
Course Syllabi | Faculty Vitae | Practicum Handbook | Student Teaching Handbook | Guidelines for Mentors
Program/Advising Forms | Undergraduate Catalog | Graduate Catalog | Student Enrollment

[About the Construction of this Site